| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
The Problem With Being SpecialDemocratic Values and Special AssessmentsUniversity of California, San Diego, vkogan{at}ucsd.edu.
University of California, San Diego In the face of voter-imposed tax limitations, local governments have adopted ever-more complex financial mechanisms to balance their budgets. Increasingly, municipalities in California have made use of special assessments to finance local infrastructure improvements and other vital government services. These assessments bill property owners for public goods and services in proportion to the "special benefits" that they receive. Because benefit assessments are constitutionally distinct from taxes, the growth in assessment financing has come partly as a direct response to increased constraints on the ability of local governments to raise general taxes. Our contention is that this growth should prove cause for concern due to the unusual combination of social choice pathologies to which special assessments fall vulnerable. Field interviews with public officials and the consultants they call on to help create these assessments suggest that special assessments can indeed pose special democratic problems.
Key Words: special benefit assessments • municipal finance • Proposition 13 • agenda control • gerrymandering
This version was published on July
1, 2009 Public Works Management & Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1,
4-36 (2009) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
