Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Works Management & Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinnaman, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Explaining the Growth in Municipal Recycling Programs

The Role of Market and Nonmarket Factors

Thomas C. Kinnaman

Bucknell University

The implementation of thousands of municipal recycling programs in the United States has increased recycling’s portion of solid waste from 10% to 30% over the past decade. But the lack of accurate data has spurred a debate over whether the growth in recycling can be attributed to market or nonmarket factors. To address this issue, this article conducts a benefit-cost analysis of a municipal recycling program. Results suggest recycling is costly. So why, then, does it remain popular? This article suggests that local governments could be responding to households that perceive a benefit from recycling services. These benefits are estimated with a contingent valuation survey.

Public Works Management & Policy, Vol. 5, No. 1, 37-51 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1087724X0051004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Works Management PolicyHome page
E. Jamelske and G. Kipperberg
A Contingent Valuation Study and Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Switch to Automated Collection of Solid Waste With Single Stream Recycling in Madison, Wisconsin
Public Works Management Policy, October 1, 2006; 11(2): 89 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
C. M. Kalinowski, G. D. Lynne, and B. Johnson
Recycling as a Reflection of Balanced Self-Interest: A Test of the Metaeconomics Approach
Environment and Behavior, May 1, 2006; 38(3): 333 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Works Management PolicyHome page
E. M. Jamelske and S. Wessling
Assessing the Support for the Switch to Automated Collection of Solid Waste With Single Stream Recycling in Madison, Wisconsin
Public Works Management Policy, October 1, 2005; 10(2): 101 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]