Public Works Management & Policy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlossberg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Public Works Management & Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 132-144 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1087724X04268562

Coordination as a Strategy for Serving the Transportation Disadvantaged

A Comparative Framework of Local and State Roles

Marc Schlossberg

University of Oregon

Given many public services previously delivered by federal and state entities continue to devolve to more local levels of service delivery and programmatic control, interorganizational coordination serves as an approach for the public sector to ensure that services are efficiently delivered in a nonduplicative manner. This article explores the issue of coordination by examining three different policy approaches toward local coordination of transportation services for the transportation disadvantaged. Local transportation services for the disadvantaged are often delivered by a variety of nonprofit organizations, operated independently by multiple entities in a community, and result in duplicative, overlapping, and uncoordinated services. The analysis concludes that although coordination sounds like an easy and magical policy solution to be effective, state-level policies must, at a minimum, target and fund the coordination process. Differing examples of how this goal is to be reached, along with an exploration of state-level and local-level activities, are presented.

Key Words: transportation disadvantaged • coordination • paratransit • nonprofit organization • social exclusion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Works Management PolicyHome page
M. W. McNamara and J. C. Morris
Walking the High Wire: A Practical Guide for Balancing Accountability and Competition in Public Works Service Arrangements
Public Works Management Policy, April 1, 2008; 12(4): 568 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Works Management PolicyHome page
E. Stommes and D. Brown
Opportunities and Challenges for Rural Transit: Lessons Learned From the Job Access and Reserve Commute Program
Public Works Management Policy, July 1, 2005; 10(1): 23 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]