|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Public Works Management & Policy, Vol. 11, No. 2,
84-88 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1087724X06295066
Expanding the Infrastructure Tent
Crafting an Inclusive Strategy for Infrastructure Funding
Richard G. Little
Keston Institute for Infrastructure, University of Southern California
References
- Hanak, E., & Rueben, K. (2006). Funding innovations for California infrastructure: Promises and pitfalls (Research Paper 06-01—March 2006). Los Angeles: The Keston Institute for Infrastructure. Available at http://www.usc.edu/schools/sppd/lusk/keston/pdf/cal-infrastructure-promise-pitfall.pdf
- Little, R. G. (2006). Funding California’s future: Options for leveraging the proceeds of SB 1024. Los Angeles: The Keston Institute for Infrastructure. Available at http://www.usc.edu/schools/sppd/lusk/keston/pdf/Funding-Californias-Future-2006-02-09.pdf
- McCubbins, M. D. (2006). Information, policy tradeoffs and direct democracy: Do initiatives improve public infrastructure investment? Issues in infrastructure. Los Angeles: The Keston Institute for Infrastructure. Available at http://www.usc.edu/schools/sppd/lusk/keston/pdf/initiatives-public-trans.pdf
- Myers, D., Pitkin, J., & Park, J. (2006). California homeowners’ growing stake in infrastructure and the future (Research Paper 06-02—April 2006). Los Angeles: The Keston Institute for Infrastructure. Available at http://www.usc.edu/schools/sppd/lusk/keston/pdf/cal-homeowners-stake.pdf
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
